Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Date: 2011-05-31 18:18:28
Message-ID: 4DE530F4.1010609@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 05/31/2011 11:05 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Joshua D. Drake's message of mar may 31 12:32:43 -0400 2011:
>
>>> Given that you have been one of the people calling for a bug tracker,
>>> and these are the two most widely used systems available, what's wrong
>>> with them and what else would you suggest?
>>
>> Just FYI, CMD uses redmine and so far it is the best we have found. It
>> isn't perfect certainly but overall it does a nice job. It supports
>> email integration as well as plugins (we have even written a couple).
>
> I certainly wouldn't suggest that Redmine wouldn't cause a change in
> workflow though.

Nor am I, I was mainly bringing it up as a (better) alternative to 
bugzilla and rt.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Florian PflugDate: 2011-05-31 18:50:23
Subject: Bug in XPATH() produces invalid XML values and probably un-restorable dumps
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-05-31 18:14:26
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group