Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project

From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Joe Abbate <jma(at)freedomcircle(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Date: 2011-05-30 05:09:21
Message-ID: 4DE32681.7000509@kaltenbrunner.cc (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 05/30/2011 04:26 AM, Greg Stark wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Joe Abbate <jma(at)freedomcircle(dot)com> wrote:
>>  Anyone interested in the tracker, please visit
>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TrackerDiscussion and add your
>> feedback/input.
> 
> I think this illustrates exactly what we *don't* want to happen with a
> bug tracker. We want the discussion to stay *here* not on some other
> medium accessible only through the web and editable only through a web
> interface....
> 
> Also your summary seems to have missed the point on the "has email
> interface" requirement. The table of features you listed has just
> "Creation of bugs via mail interface" as the only feature that is
> accessible from email.
> 
> I'm not sure what Robert meant but I suspect he meant what I would
> want which is the ability to add comments, close bugs, set other
> properties, etc. By email. My biggest gripe about bugzilla was that it
> sent you an email with updates to the bug but you couldn't respond to
> that email.

well bugzilla has an inbound email interface as well that can both be
used to creande and to manipulate bugs (as in "mails that have the
bug-id in the subject will be added as a comment").
The demo installation did that by simply being subscribed to -bugs.

> 
> My ideal bug tracker is the debian one which basically stays out of
> your way and lets you cc any message to a specific bug at
> nnnn(at)bugs(dot)debian(dot)org which archives that message in the bug and sends
> it to anyone listening to the bug. And you can have control commands
> to close it or edit it -- basically making all our existing "that's
> not a bug bleah bleah" messages into "close nnn; that's not a bug
> bleah bleah" messages.

that is what every emailinterface should be able to provide ;). However
the real issue with say BZ(or most other trackers) in this role is that
in order to attribute a bug report or a comment to the original
author/person you have to trust the "From" in the email and basically
autocreate an account based on that information for the tracker to work
with.


Stefan

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2011-05-30 05:30:37
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Previous:From: Joe AbbateDate: 2011-05-30 04:32:29
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group