| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Edison So <edison(dot)so2(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "List, Postgres" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: max_connections proposal |
| Date: | 2011-05-29 08:45:24 |
| Message-ID: | 4DE207A4.9060708@postnewspapers.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 29/05/2011 4:39 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 29/05/2011 10:44 AM, Edison So wrote:
>> Can anyone tell me that if the max_connections is above 100, the server
>> will use pooling instead?
>
> No. PostgreSQL does not have any built-in connection pooling, that was
> the point of the suggestion, to advise people that they might want to
> consider it.
Whoops, bad wording.
"That was the point of my original suggestion: to advise people that
they might want to consider configuring a third-party connection pool
like PgPool-II or PgBouncer instead of greatly increasing max_connections ".
--
Craig Ringer
Tech-related writing at http://soapyfrogs.blogspot.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tareq Tajkeh | 2011-05-29 13:17:18 | |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2011-05-29 08:39:23 | Re: max_connections proposal |