On 25.05.2011 00:58, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> On 22.05.2011 21:18, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I'm also concerned that you've probably
>>> added cycles on net to MemoryContextAlloc (where it's no longer possible
>>> to tail-call AllocSetAlloc), which could very easily cost more cycles on
>>> most workloads than could ever be saved by making MemoryContextReset a
>>> shade faster.
>> Good point. That would be solved by clearing the flag before the
>> AllocSetAlloc() call. I don't see any harm in clearing the flag before
>> actually doing the allocation.
> Done that way.
In response to
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2011-05-25 18:55:35|
|Subject: pgsql: Put options in some sensible order|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2011-05-25 04:21:42|
|Subject: pgsql: Convert builddoc.bat into a perl script that actually works.|