Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry
Date: 2011-05-21 03:42:57
Message-ID: 4DD734C1.5040606@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
> Yeah, I think keeping a single mailing list server is better.  I don't
> think the extra load is going to be all that much anyway -- if we can
> handle pgsql-hackers and pgsql-general, we shouldn't have much problem
> adding a couple dozen mostly inactive lists (compared to those).
>
> The only interesting bit is going to be the list mgmt interface ...
> but that's probably OK.
>
Well pgfoundry uses mailman....?

JD



In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Joshua BerkusDate: 2011-05-21 15:07:15
Subject: Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-05-21 03:32:02
Subject: Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group