| From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(dot)berkus(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? |
| Date: | 2011-05-06 18:32:36 |
| Message-ID: | 4DC43EC4.10904@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Browne wrote:
> I'm getting "paper cuts" quite a bit these days over the differences
> between what different packaging systems decide to install. The one
> *I* get notably bit on, of late, is that I have written code that
> expects to have pg_config to do some degree of self-discovery, only to
> find production folk complaining that they only have "psql" available
> in their environment.
>
Given the other improvements in being able to build extensions in 9.1,
we really should push packagers to move pg_config from the PostgreSQL
development package into the main one starting in that version. I've
gotten bit by this plenty of times.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2011-05-06 18:41:02 | New Canadian nonprofit for trademark, postgresql.org domain, etc. |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2011-05-06 18:32:15 | Re: Compiling a PostgreSQL 7.3.2 project with Eclipse |