Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Date: 2011-05-05 18:59:49
Message-ID: 4DC2F3A5.6050704@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers
Simon,

> I doubt that anyone wants the current behaviour.
> 
> It's a very common thing for minor changes during beta to improve software.
> I think we should be listening to users so that we round off the
> features being delivered with a few tweaks.

Actually, I find the Unlogged tables very useful as they are.  I have at
least 20 clients who store their "session" tables in PostgreSQL, as well
as quite a few clients who use PostgreSQL as a backing store for a queue
with ephemeral data.  And the Unlogged tables are terrrific for doing ELT.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2011-05-05 19:00:12
Subject: Re: Visibility map and hint bits
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-05-05 18:53:36
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2011-05-05 19:00:51
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-05-05 18:53:36
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group