| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais" <ioguix(at)free(dot)fr>, damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>, Roy Hann <specially(at)processed(dot)almost(dot)meat>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Date: | 2011-05-05 18:17:33 |
| Message-ID: | 4DC2E9BD.4030700@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
> Saying "similar to in-memory tables" sounds immediately misleading to
> me. If I didn't know any better, I'd assume:
We can be perfectly technically correct, or we can have people who
aren't already PostgreSQL users get interested enough to try our stuff.
There is no third choice.
So far, the only suggestions I've seen for how to advocate this feature
have involved renaming it, which isn't realistic at this point. If
someone has an alternative description for the feature that anyone who
is not already a PostgreSQL DBA will care about, them please come
forward with it.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-05-05 18:27:03 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-05-05 17:30:24 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-05-05 18:27:03 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2011-05-05 18:11:41 | Re: Visibility map and hint bits |