Re: Proposal - asynchronous functions

From: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal - asynchronous functions
Date: 2011-04-26 19:32:57
Message-ID: 4DB71DE9.1000201@bluegap.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert,

On 04/26/2011 02:25 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> We've talked about a number of features that could benefit from some
> kind of "worker process" facility (e.g. logical replication, parallel
> query). So far no one has stepped forward to build such a facility,
> and I think without that this can't even get off the ground.

Remember the bgworker patches extracted from Postgres-R?

[ Interestingly enough, one of the complaints I heard back then (not
necessarily from you) was that there's no user for bgworkers, yet.
Smells a lot like a chicken and egg problem to me. ]

Regards

Markus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2011-04-26 19:45:25 Re: Memory leak in FDW
Previous Message Dann Corbit 2011-04-26 18:58:35 Re: What was the exact version of PostgreSQL where the column name length changed from 31 to 63 characters?