| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Blewett <david(at)dawninglight(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: branching for 9.2devel |
| Date: | 2011-04-25 17:16:49 |
| Message-ID: | 4DB5AC81.7040506@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/25/2011 01:12 PM, David Blewett wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> "Kevin Grittner"<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
>>> Aidan Van Dyk<aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> wrote:
>>>> Of course, that all depends on:
>>>> 1) pgindent being "work everywhere", "exactly the same"
>>>> 2) Discipline of all new published commits being "pgindent clean".
>>> The problem is that getting it set up isn't yet trivial. This is
>>> all assuming that we fix that.
>> Yeah, there is not much point in thinking about #2 until we have #1.
> Would this be a good GSoC project (or has the deadline passed)?
>
Greg Smith and I have done some work on it, and we're going to discuss
it at pgCon. I don't think there's terribly far to go.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-04-25 17:18:38 | Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-04-25 17:12:59 | Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off |