Re: Unnessecary use of new Integer(n) in AbstractJdbc2ResultSet

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Lew" <noone(at)lewscanon(dot)com>,<pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Subject: Re: Unnessecary use of new Integer(n) in AbstractJdbc2ResultSet
Date: 2011-04-25 21:06:45
Message-ID: 4DB59C15020000250003CE0C@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:

> I just downloaded the "postgresql-9.1dev-900" jars, and I find
> that the -jdbc3 jar has a bytecode version compatible with a JDK
> 1.0 and 1.1 JVMs, even though we reference classes and methods
> which aren't available until later JVMs.

I just double-checked, and found that I'd messed up my initial check
on that. The right target level is used for each. Sorry for the
noise.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Migowski 2011-04-27 12:02:40 Re: Configurable Send/Receive Buffer Sizes
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-04-25 19:57:17 Re: [BUGS] [JDBC] Missing documentation for error code: 80S01