Re: 9.1 doesn't start when died mid-backup

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: depesz(at)depesz(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: 9.1 doesn't start when died mid-backup
Date: 2011-04-13 19:10:44
Message-ID: 4DA5F534.2060206@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 13.04.2011 14:18, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 13.04.2011 10:49, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
>> hi
>> got new 9.1, straight from git.
>> compiled, installed.
>> did initdb, and then set config values using this script:
>> perl -pi -e '
>> s/\A \s* (?: [#] \s* )? listen_addresses \s* = \s*.*/listen_addresses
>> = \047*\047/x;
>> s/\A \s* (?: [#] \s* )? log_destination \s* = \s*.*/log_destination =
>> \047stderr\047/x;
>> s/\A \s* (?: [#] \s* )? logging_collector \s* =
>> \s*.*/logging_collector = on/x;
>> s/\A \s* (?: [#] \s* )? log_min_duration_statement \s* =
>> \s*.*/log_min_duration_statement = 0/x;
>> s/\A \s* (?: [#] \s* )? log_line_prefix \s* = \s*.*/log_line_prefix =
>> \047\%m \%u\(at)\%d \%p \%r \047/x;
>> s/\A \s* (?: [#] \s* )? log_temp_files \s* = \s*.*/log_temp_files = 0/x;
>> s/\A \s* (?: [#] \s* )?
>> (log_checkpoints|log_connections|log_disconnections|log_lock_waits)
>> \s* = \s*.*/$1 = on/x;
>> s/\A \s* (?: [#] \s* )? wal_level \s* = \s*.*/wal_level = hot_standby/x;
>> s/\A \s* (?: [#] \s* )? archive_mode \s* = \s*.*/archive_mode = on/x;
>> s/\A \s* (?: [#] \s* )? archive_command \s* = \s*.*/archive_command =
>> \047\/bin\/true\047/x;
>> ' data/postgresql.conf
>>
>> afterwards I did start pg.
>>
>> then, i connected with psql, and issued:
>> $ select pg_start_backup('xx');
>> pg_start_backup
>> -----------------
>> 0/2000020
>> (1 row)
>>
>> $ create database pgdba;
>> CREATE DATABASE
>>
>> $ create user postgres with superuser;
>> CREATE ROLE
>>
>> $ create user depesz with superuser;
>> CREATE ROLE
>>
>> $ create database depesz with owner depesz;
>> CREATE DATABASE
>>
>> Afterwards, I exited psql, and simulated power-failure, with:
>>
>> =$ killall -9 postgres; killall -9 postmaster
>> postmaster: no process found
>>
>> All pg processes were killed.
>>
>> When I then tried to start Pg, I got:
>> =$ pg_ctl start
>> pg_ctl: another server might be running; trying to start server anyway
>> server starting
>>
>> but it didn't start.
>>
>> log looks like this:
>> =$ cat postgresql-2011-04-13_093859.log
>> 2011-04-13 09:38:59.807 CEST @ 3446 LOG: database system was
>> interrupted; last known up at 2011-04-13 09:38:43 CEST
>> 2011-04-13 09:38:59.807 CEST @ 3446 LOG: database system was not
>> properly shut down; automatic recovery in progress
>> 2011-04-13 09:38:59.852 CEST @ 3446 LOG: redo starts at 0/2000020
>> 2011-04-13 09:39:00.304 CEST @ 3446 LOG: record with zero length at
>> 0/20018E8
>> 2011-04-13 09:39:00.304 CEST @ 3446 LOG: redo done at 0/2001898
>> 2011-04-13 09:39:00.304 CEST @ 3446 LOG: last completed transaction
>> was at log time 2011-04-13 09:38:43.563356+02
>> 2011-04-13 09:39:00.304 CEST @ 3446 FATAL: WAL ends before end of
>> online backup
>> 2011-04-13 09:39:00.304 CEST @ 3446 HINT: Online backup started with
>> pg_start_backup() must be ended with pg_stop_backup(), and all WAL up
>> to that point must be available at recovery.
>> 2011-04-13 09:39:00.304 CEST @ 3444 LOG: startup process (PID 3446)
>> exited with exit code 1
>> 2011-04-13 09:39:00.304 CEST @ 3444 LOG: aborting startup due to
>> startup process failure
>>
>> interestingl7y backup_label got renamed to backup_label.old, and
>> contains:
>> START WAL LOCATION: 0/2000020 (file 000000010000000000000002)
>> CHECKPOINT LOCATION: 0/2000058
>> START TIME: 2011-04-13 09:38:19 CEST
>> LABEL: xx
>>
>> Given the file was renamed, I retried:
>>
>> =$ pg_ctl start
>> server starting
>>
>> but again - it didn't work.
>>
>> Log looks like this:
>>
>> 2011-04-13 09:44:06.844 CEST @ 3783 LOG: database system was
>> interrupted while in recovery at 2011-04-13 09:38:59 CEST
>> 2011-04-13 09:44:06.844 CEST @ 3783 HINT: This probably means that
>> some data is corrupted and you will have to use the last backup for
>> recovery.
>> 2011-04-13 09:44:06.845 CEST @ 3783 LOG: database system was not
>> properly shut down; automatic recovery in progress
>> 2011-04-13 09:44:06.877 CEST @ 3783 LOG: redo starts at 0/2000020
>> 2011-04-13 09:44:07.316 CEST @ 3783 LOG: record with zero length at
>> 0/20018E8
>> 2011-04-13 09:44:07.316 CEST @ 3783 LOG: redo done at 0/2001898
>> 2011-04-13 09:44:07.316 CEST @ 3783 LOG: last completed transaction
>> was at log time 2011-04-13 09:38:43.563356+02
>> 2011-04-13 09:44:07.316 CEST @ 3783 FATAL: WAL ends before end of
>> online backup
>> 2011-04-13 09:44:07.316 CEST @ 3783 HINT: Online backup started with
>> pg_start_backup() must be ended with pg_stop_backup(), and all WAL up
>> to that point must be available at recovery.
>> 2011-04-13 09:44:07.316 CEST @ 3776 LOG: startup process (PID 3783)
>> exited with exit code 1
>> 2011-04-13 09:44:07.316 CEST @ 3776 LOG: aborting startup due to
>> startup process failure
>>
>>
>> So, it looks to me that by killing postgres mid-backup I made it end
>> up in some state that doesn't let it start again.
>>
>> I *think* it might be related to this:
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-03/msg01490.php and
>> more
>> specifically, with this:
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-03/msg01627.php
>
> Yep :-(. I'm thinking we need to revert that change, now that we know
> there was a reason for only checking the end-of-WAL when doing archive
> recovery after all. We can keep it as a warning, though. With a hint
> explaining that if you're doing crash recovery from a database that
> crashed while an online backup was in progress, it's ok, but if you're
> recovering from an online backup, the backup is broken.

Committed a quick revertion of this for now.

> For backups taken with pg_basebackup in 9.1, we can add a flag to the
> backup_label, indicating that the backup was taken with pg_basebackup.
> For such backups, the above scenario really should not happen, and we
> can still make it a hard error if it does.

Added this to the open items list.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2011-04-13 19:52:20 Re: BUG #5974: UNION construct type cast gives poor error message
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-04-13 18:32:31 Re: BUG #5974: UNION construct type cast gives poor error message