Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck

From: Jesper Krogh <jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Date: 2011-04-07 04:27:57
Message-ID: 4D9D3D4D.300@krogh.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 2011-03-28 22:21, Greg Smith wrote:
> Some may still find these two cheap for enterprise use, given the use
> of MLC limits how much activity these drives can handle. But it's
> great to have a new option for lower budget system that can tolerate
> some risk there.
>
Drifting of the topic slightly.. Has anyone opinions/experience with:
http://www.ocztechnology.com/ocz-z-drive-r2-p88-pci-express-ssd.html

They seem to be "like" the FusionIO drives just quite a lot cheaper,
wonder what the state of those 512MB is in case of a power-loss.

--
Jesper

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2011-04-07 05:48:26 Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Previous Message David Boreham 2011-04-07 03:52:03 Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck