| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Joseph Adams <joeyadams3(dot)14159(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Another swing at JSON |
| Date: | 2011-03-30 16:38:33 |
| Message-ID: | 4D935C89.4040306@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/30/2011 12:29 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> I think we're pretty much down to only fixing bugs now, for 9.1, and this
>> isn't a bug, however inconvenient it might be.
> It's not just inconvenient, it's setting a bad example for people to
> work on their own extensions. It's more than unfortunate. I will
> prepare a doc patch, but copying from contrib is the usual way to go
> creating your own extension, right?
>
>
None of that makes it a bug.
I don't have any objection to putting some comments in the contrib
Makefiles telling people to use PGXS, but I don't think that at this
stage of the cycle we can start work on something that so far is just an
idea from the top of my head.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2011-03-30 16:43:36 | Re: Process local hint bit cache |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-03-30 16:29:32 | Re: Another swing at JSON |