On 03/30/2011 12:29 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> I think we're pretty much down to only fixing bugs now, for 9.1, and this
>> isn't a bug, however inconvenient it might be.
> It's not just inconvenient, it's setting a bad example for people to
> work on their own extensions. It's more than unfortunate. I will
> prepare a doc patch, but copying from contrib is the usual way to go
> creating your own extension, right?
None of that makes it a bug.
I don't have any objection to putting some comments in the contrib
Makefiles telling people to use PGXS, but I don't think that at this
stage of the cycle we can start work on something that so far is just an
idea from the top of my head.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Merlin Moncure||Date: 2011-03-30 16:43:36|
|Subject: Re: Process local hint bit cache|
|Previous:||From: Dimitri Fontaine||Date: 2011-03-30 16:29:32|
|Subject: Re: Another swing at JSON|