On 2011-03-29 18:50, Jeff wrote:
> we have some new drives that we are going to use initially, but
> eventually it'll be a secure-erase'd one we replace it with (which
> should perform identical to a new one)
> What enclosure & controller are you using on the 24 disk beast?
LSI 8888ELP and a HP D2700 enclosure.
Works flawlessly, the only bad thing (which actually is pretty grave)
is that the controller mis-numbers the slots in the enclosure, so
you'll have to have the "mapping" drawn on paper next to the
enclosure to replace the correct disk.
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Samuel Gendler||Date: 2011-03-29 22:16:19|
|Subject: multiple table scan performance|
|Previous:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2011-03-29 19:28:14|
|Subject: Re: very long updates very small tables|