On 3/28/2011 8:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck<JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
>> I somehow fail to see how this complete reversal of who does what and
>> affecting code in entirely different parts of the system will qualify
>> for patching back releases.
> I don't think any of the proposals make sense for back-patching. We
> should be considering what's the sanest way to fix this in 9.2.
So our answer to users, who currently run 8.4 and experience 10+ minute
blackouts caused by autovac, would be "upgrade to 9.2 when it's out".
Is that actually what you meant?
Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither
liberty nor security. -- Benjamin Franklin
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Craig Ringer||Date: 2011-03-29 02:22:12|
|Subject: Re: BUG #5927: PostgreSQL8.2|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-03-29 00:07:18|
|Subject: Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full) |