Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full)

From: Rainer Pruy <Rainer(dot)Pruy(at)Acrys(dot)COM>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full)
Date: 2011-03-28 14:31:35
Message-ID: 4D909BC7.9050502@acrys.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
I digged into my sent folder,
and the outgoing message already dat the false headers.
So probably my MUA (thunderbird) got confused on something and caused
that blunder.

Sorry for that
Rainer

Am 28.03.2011 16:05, schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
> Rainer, any idea?  Please see
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4D906269.6060109@commandprompt.com
>
>
> Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of lun mar 28 11:03:16 -0300 2011:
>> Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of lun mar 28 07:26:49 -0300 2011:
>>> Likely "too large" is more an issue related to available resources than
>>> of absolute figure.
>>>
>>> On a penta byte of free storage I would not mind allocating some teras
>>> with extending a (large) table.
>>> If I'm left with some MB only, I'd be concerned for sure.
>> ...
>>
>> Does anybody have an idea just W-T-F happened here?  I did NOT send the
>> above email (as evidenced by it being signed by "Rainer").  I notice it
>> even has a "@commandprompt.com" message-id.  Should I start signing my
>> email?
>>

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Sergey BurladyanDate: 2011-03-28 18:04:25
Subject: Re: BUG #5950: backend terminating after altering table
Previous:From: Rainer PruyDate: 2011-03-28 14:28:54
Subject: Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group