Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Rectifying wrong Date outputs

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Piyush Newe" <piyush(dot)newe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rectifying wrong Date outputs
Date: 2011-03-17 14:40:27
Message-ID: 4D81D70B020000250003BA19@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
 
> what we should first do is see what Oracle does in such cases,
> because the main driving factor for these functions is Oracle
> compatibility not what might seem sane in a vacuum.
 
+1
 
-Kevin

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-03-17 14:56:17
Subject: Re: volatile markings to silence compilers
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-03-17 14:29:46
Subject: Re: Rectifying wrong Date outputs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group