Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Top five challenges

From: silly sad <sad(at)bestmx(dot)ru>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Top five challenges
Date: 2011-03-03 11:01:21
Message-ID: 4D6F7501.30904@bestmx.ru (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
On 03/02/11 17:07, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from sad's message of mié mar 02 10:23:53 -0300 2011:
>> On Mar 2 2011, Josh Berkus wrote:
> 
>>>> 3. To make TIMESTAMPTZ useful by introducing proper type cast
>>>> TIMESTAMPTZ to TIMESTAMP
>>>
>>> Why are you using Timestamp-no-tz at all?  I was thinking we should
>>> change the default ...
>>
>> Why did u introduced it?
> 
> The standard requires the current behavior.  It's not going to change.
> It changed in 7.1 or so.
> 

does standard require to have TWO DIFFERENT EPOCHS?

SELECT 'epoch'::TIMESTAMPTZ, 'epoch'::TIMESTAMP;

In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2011-03-03 17:58:44
Subject: Re: Top five challenges
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-03-02 16:36:00
Subject: Re: Top five challenges

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2011-03-03 17:58:44
Subject: Re: Top five challenges
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-03-02 16:36:00
Subject: Re: Top five challenges

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group