On 2011-02-28 9:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja<marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> writes:
>> On 2011-02-28 8:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> So: exactly what is the intended behavioral change as of now, and what
>>> is the argument supporting that change?
>> The only intended change is what I was wondering in the original post:
>> snapshot handling between normal execution and EXPLAIN ANALYZE when a
>> query expands to multiple trees because of rewrite rules. Like I said
>> earlier, this is just a bugfix now that wCTEs don't need it anymore.
> OK, and which behavior is getting changed, to what? I am not interested
> in trying to reverse-engineer a specification from the patch.
My recollection is (and the archives seem to agree) that normal
execution and SQL functions were changed to only advance the CID instead
of taking a new snapshot. EXPLAIN ANALYZE and SPI (not exactly sure
about this one) did that already so they were just changed to use the
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: David Fetter||Date: 2011-02-28 19:22:59|
|Subject: Re: EXPLAIN doesn't show sufficient info for wCTE cases|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Hammond||Date: 2011-02-28 19:17:53|
|Subject: Re: mysql2pgsql.perl update|