Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies
Date: 2011-02-24 00:38:05
Message-ID: 4D65A86D.8040308@cs.helsinki.fi (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2011-02-24 2:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja<marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>  writes:
>> On 2011-02-24 12:39 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> My recollection is that this was pretty tightly coupled to the wCTE
>>> patch.
>
>> It was, but isn't anymore.  Now it's just a bugfix.
>
> The connection is the question of where to do CommandCounterIncrement
> between successive DML WITH operations in a single command.

.. what?  We decided *not* to do any CommandCounterIncrements between 
DML WITHs.


Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-02-24 00:39:23
Subject: Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-02-24 00:35:13
Subject: Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group