Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Binary in/out for aclitem

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Radosław Smogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Binary in/out for aclitem
Date: 2011-02-22 22:13:17
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/22/2011 05:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?utf-8?q?Rados=C5=82aw_Smogura?=<rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>  writes:
>> Actaully one more POD left it's aclitem :). In Java for e.g. it is used to
>> obtain column priviliges, I assume some folks may want to use it too.
> I think this one has got far less use-case than the other, and I don't
> want to expose the internal representation of ACLITEM to the world.
> So, nope, not excited about it.

The sendv for enums sends the label, and ISTR there are some others that 
send the text representation also. Would that be better?



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-02-22 22:24:28
Subject: Re: Binary in/out for aclitem
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-02-22 22:04:19
Subject: Re: Binary in/out for aclitem

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group