Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Binary in/out for aclitem

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Radosław Smogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Binary in/out for aclitem
Date: 2011-02-22 22:13:17
Message-ID: 4D6434FD.3000605@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/22/2011 05:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?utf-8?q?Rados=C5=82aw_Smogura?=<rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>  writes:
>> Actaully one more POD left it's aclitem :). In Java for e.g. it is used to
>> obtain column priviliges, I assume some folks may want to use it too.
> I think this one has got far less use-case than the other, and I don't
> want to expose the internal representation of ACLITEM to the world.
> So, nope, not excited about it.
>

The sendv for enums sends the label, and ISTR there are some others that 
send the text representation also. Would that be better?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-02-22 22:24:28
Subject: Re: Binary in/out for aclitem
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-02-22 22:04:19
Subject: Re: Binary in/out for aclitem

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group