Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SSI patch version 14

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com, markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SSI patch version 14
Date: 2011-02-02 17:41:35
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 02.02.2011 19:36, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas  wrote:
>> Suppressing detail seems easiest. AFAICS all the variable parts are
>> in errdetail.
> I pushed that with some work on the tests.  If you could review the
> changes to isolationtester.c to confirm that they look sane, I'd
> appreciate it.
> If that part is right, it shouldn't take me very long to finish the
> specs and capture the expected results.

Looks good. A comment would be in order to explain why we only print the 
primary message. (yeah, I know I didn't comment the tester code very 
well myself)

   Heikki Linnakangas

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2011-02-02 17:55:34
Subject: Re: WIP: RangeTypes
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2011-02-02 17:36:31
Subject: Re: SSI patch version 14

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group