Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

From: Mladen Gogala <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com>
To: Samuel Gendler <sgendler(at)ideasculptor(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "david(at)lang(dot)hm" <david(at)lang(dot)hm>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Date: 2011-02-02 03:40:16
Message-ID: 4D48D220.9030104@vmsinfo.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
Samuel Gendler wrote:
>
>  
> Don't listen to him.  He's got an oracle bias.
And bad sinuses, too.
>  Slashdot already announced that NoSQL is actually going to dominate 
> the world, so postgres has already lost that battle.  Everything 
> postgres devs do now is just an exercise in relational masturbation. 
>  Trust me.
>
I knew that there is some entertainment value on this list. Samuel, your 
point of view is very..., er, refreshing. Trust me.


-- 
Mladen Gogala 
Sr. Oracle DBA
1500 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
(212) 329-5251
www.vmsinfo.com 


In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Samuel GendlerDate: 2011-02-02 04:07:47
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Previous:From: Samuel GendlerDate: 2011-02-02 03:13:38
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Samuel GendlerDate: 2011-02-02 04:07:47
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Previous:From: Luis OchoaDate: 2011-02-02 03:25:34
Subject: A postgres parser related question

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group