On 01/02/11 07:27, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert, Mark,
>
> I have not been able to reproduce this issue in a clean test on 9.0. As
> a result, I now think that it was related to the FSM being too small on
> the user's 8.3 instance, and will consider it resolved.
>
Right - it might be interesting to see if you can reproduce on 8.4. I
would hazard a guess that you will not (on disk FSM + visibility map
vacuum improvements seem to make this whole area way better).
Cheers
Mark