Re: Is there a way to build PostgreSQL client libraries with MinGW

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Xiaobo Gu <guxiaobo1982(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is there a way to build PostgreSQL client libraries with MinGW
Date: 2011-01-27 14:36:31
Message-ID: 4D4182EF.5080709@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On 01/27/2011 09:19 AM, Xiaobo Gu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>> On 01/27/2011 08:51 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Xiaobo Gu<guxiaobo1982(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> 20:25<jon_y>: please contact psql and ask for a list of accept()
>>>> implementations checked
>>> It looks like we check each argument and the return type for a couple
>>> of possibilities:
>>>
>>> argument 1 can be int or unsigned int
>>> argument 2 can be struct sockaddr * or const struct sockaddr * or void *
>>> argument 3 can be int * or size_t * or socklen_t * or unsigned int * or
>>> void *
>>> the return type can be int or unsigned int PASCAL
>>>
>>>
>> Yeah. it looks like the return type is the likely culprit. It looks like it
>> wants either a signed or unsigned int64. Also, the mingw64 API uses the
>> WSAAPI qualifier instead of PASCAL.
>>
> I am still trying, but I think it may be the first argument, because
> MinGW64 define SOCKET as a pointer, but you accept int or unsigned int
>

No it doesn't. It defines it as an INT_PTR or UINT_PTR which in turn is
an __int64, I think. But you're right, we might need to look at the
first argument as well as the return type.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-01-27 14:40:04 Re: BUG #5852: Function date_trunc is not IMMUTABLE
Previous Message Xiaobo Gu 2011-01-27 14:19:14 Re: Is there a way to build PostgreSQL client libraries with MinGW

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-01-27 14:46:56 Re: ALTER TYPE 3: add facility to identify further no-work cases
Previous Message Xiaobo Gu 2011-01-27 14:19:14 Re: Is there a way to build PostgreSQL client libraries with MinGW