| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Markus Wanner" <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, "Dan Ports" <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, "Pg Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SSI patch version 14 |
| Date: | 2011-01-26 19:42:23 |
| Message-ID: | 4D4024BF0200002500039D66@gw.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> BTW did you try "make coverage" and friends? See
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/regress-coverage.html
> and
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/coverage/
I had missed that; thanks for pointing it out!
I'm doing a coverage build now, to see what coverage we get from
`make check` (probably not much) and `make dcheck`.
Dan, do you still have access to that machine you were using for the
DBT-2 runs? Could we get a coverage run with and without
TEST_OLDSERXID defined?
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexey Klyukin | 2011-01-26 19:44:26 | Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH] |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-01-26 19:39:27 | Re: Explain with schema |