Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SSI patch version 14

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Markus Wanner" <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, "Dan Ports" <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, "Pg Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SSI patch version 14
Date: 2011-01-26 19:42:23
Message-ID: 4D4024BF0200002500039D66@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
 
> BTW did you try "make coverage" and friends?  See
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/regress-coverage.html
> and
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/coverage/
 
I had missed that; thanks for pointing it out!
 
I'm doing a coverage build now, to see what coverage we get from
`make check` (probably not much) and `make dcheck`.
 
Dan, do you still have access to that machine you were using for the
DBT-2 runs?  Could we get a coverage run with and without
TEST_OLDSERXID defined?
 
-Kevin

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alexey KlyukinDate: 2011-01-26 19:44:26
Subject: Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH]
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-01-26 19:39:27
Subject: Re: Explain with schema

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group