On 01/11/2011 07:17 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I think there's at least a danger of breaking legacy code doing that. Say you have some code that does a ref test on the argument, for example. The behavior would now be changed.
> I think that'd be pretty rare.
Possibly it would. But we usually try pretty hard to avoid that sort of
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-01-12 01:27:36|
|Subject: Re: Spread checkpoint sync|
|Previous:||From: Tatsuo Ishii||Date: 2011-01-12 00:43:19|
|Subject: Re: LOCK for non-tables |