From:
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To:
"Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:
"Greg Smith" <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject:
Re: [PATCH] V3: Idle in transaction cancellation
Date:
2011-01-03 14:47:31
Message-ID:
4D218D230200002500038F21@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2010-10-17 17:58:43 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2010-10-19 14:18:29 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2010-10-19 14:27:17 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-10-30 08:49:21 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2010-11-02 17:33:15 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2010-11-02 21:36:19 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2010-11-02 21:52:17 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2010-11-02 21:59:15 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2010-11-02 22:11:56 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2010-11-02 22:52:40 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-11-29 22:38:48 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2010-11-29 23:42:57 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2010-12-01 23:48:53 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2010-12-02 14:57:18 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2010-12-02 18:35:35 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2010-12-02 20:54:54 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2010-12-02 21:21:37 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2010-12-02 21:36:51 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2010-12-16 12:32:46 from Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
2010-12-16 13:49:45 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2010-12-16 16:58:24 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-12-16 17:12:30 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-12-16 17:46:43 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-12-16 18:03:14 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-12-16 18:24:50 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-12-16 20:10:31 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-12-16 20:18:58 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-12-16 20:32:17 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-12-16 20:41:10 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-12-16 20:49:38 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-12-16 20:54:51 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-12-16 21:30:02 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2010-12-16 22:55:36 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2010-12-23 22:04:43 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2011-01-03 14:38:56 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2011-01-03 14:47:31 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2011-01-03 15:03:58 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2011-01-04 03:25:22 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2010-12-15 01:20:31 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-12-15 12:13:30 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2010-12-15 12:33:30 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-12-15 12:47:08 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2010-12-15 14:40:20 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-12-15 15:02:14 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2010-12-15 19:12:45 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-12-16 14:12:38 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Is anybody working on this patch?
I'm not, but I sure hope someone is -- we could *really* use this in
the SSI patch. With something providing the equivalent
functionality to Andres's previous patch, and about one day's work
in the SSI patch, SSI could guarantee that an immediate retry of a
transaction rolled back with a serialization failure would not fail
again on conflicts with the same transaction(s). This would be a
very nice guarantee to be able to make.
-Kevin
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-01-03 14:57:27Subject : Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about
duplicated ctidPrevious :From : Alvaro HerreraDate : 2011-01-03 14:38:56Subject : Re: [PATCH] V3: Idle in transaction cancellation
