On 12/15/10 4:58 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> > In any case, a doc patch would be the right thing for the back branches.
> I can look at this too (yes, I know we just wrapped, but I'm working
> down the backlog :S). You mean something as simple as "this parameter
> is unavailable if the server was not compiled with support for SSL"?
Exactly. If you don't get around to it, bug me in January.
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Rajesh Sundar||Date: 2010-12-16 06:03:22|
|Subject: pgAgent JobScheduler not running jobs|
|Previous:||From: Ng, Stan||Date: 2010-12-16 00:07:57|
|Subject: Re: index corruption on composite primary key indexes|