Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: What happened to SSL_CIPHERS?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What happened to SSL_CIPHERS?
Date: 2010-12-16 01:25:50
Message-ID: 4D096A9E.7050204@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On 12/15/10 4:58 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> > In any case, a doc patch would be the right thing for the back branches.
> 
> I can look at this too (yes, I know we just wrapped, but I'm working
> down the backlog :S). You mean something as simple as "this parameter
> is unavailable if the server was not compiled with support for SSL"?

Exactly.  If you don't get around to it, bug me in January.

-- 
                                  -- Josh Berkus
                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                                     http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Rajesh SundarDate: 2010-12-16 06:03:22
Subject: pgAgent JobScheduler not running jobs
Previous:From: Ng, StanDate: 2010-12-16 00:07:57
Subject: Re: index corruption on composite primary key indexes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group