| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, YebHavinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "w(dot)p(dot)dijkstra(at)mgrid(dot)net" <w(dot)p(dot)dijkstra(at)mgrid(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child |
| Date: | 2010-12-05 14:37:51 |
| Message-ID: | 4CFBA3BF.4070009@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/04/2010 07:12 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> I wouldn't necessarily be opposed to official topic branches at some point in the future, but I think it's premature to speculate about whether it'd be useful here.
I'd need a lot of convincing if it imposed an extra burden on people
like Tom. The only way I could see working is if some committer took
ownership of the topic branch and guaranteed to keep it pretty much in
sync with the master branch.
> What is needed right now is design work, not code.
>
Indeed. In this case I don't think we even have agreement on the
features let alone how they might work.
cheers
andreew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-12-05 15:11:35 | serializable read only deferrable |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-12-05 14:30:25 | Re: what are clog and xlog? |