From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Spread checkpoint sync |
Date: | 2010-12-02 19:48:54 |
Message-ID: | 4CF7F826.1060301@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Using sync_file_range you can specify the set of blocks to sync and
> then block on them only after some time has passed. But there's no
> documentation on how this relates to the I/O scheduler so it's not
> clear it would have any effect on the problem. We might still have to
> delay the begining of the sync to allow the dirty blocks to be synced
> naturally and then when we issue it still end up catching a lot of
> other i/o as well.
This *really* sounds like we should be working with the FS geeks on
making the OS do this work for us. Greg, you wanna go to LinuxCon next
year?
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-12-02 19:52:27 | Re: directory archive format for pg_dump |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2010-12-02 19:24:13 | Re: Spread checkpoint sync |