>> Now, if only I could think of some way to write a parallel dump to a
>> set of pipes, I'd be in heaven.
> The only way I can see that working sanely would be to have a program
> gathering stuff at the other end of the pipes, and ensuring it was all
> coherent. That would be a huge growth in scope for this, and I seriously
> doubt it's worth it.
Oh, no question. And there's workarounds ... sshfs, for example. I'm
just thinking of the ad-hoc parallel backup I'm running today, which
relies heavily on pipes.
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2010-12-02 18:35:35|
|Subject: Re: V3: Idle in transaction cancellation|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2010-12-02 18:10:45|
|Subject: Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump|