| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Florian Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>,"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Yeb Havinga" <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>, "w(dot)p(dot)dijkstra(at)mgrid(dot)net" <w(dot)p(dot)dijkstra(at)mgrid(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL-development Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child |
| Date: | 2010-12-01 16:11:41 |
| Message-ID: | 4CF61F5D020000250003800E@gw.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> wrote:
> BTW, my "serializable_lock_consisteny" patch would allow you to do
> this purely within pl/pgsql in a race-condition free way. So if
> that patch should get applied you might want to consider this as a
> workaround. Whether it will get applied is yet to be seen, though
> - currently there doesn't seem to be unanimous vote one way or the
> other.
I don't recall seeing any objections to your patch. Do you have a
reference to a post that argues against it?
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-12-01 16:15:38 | Re: [HACKERS] Improved JDBC driver part 2 |
| Previous Message | Florian Pflug | 2010-12-01 16:10:46 | Re: improving foreign key locks |