Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] V3: Idle in transaction cancellation

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] V3: Idle in transaction cancellation
Date: 2010-11-29 22:38:48
Message-ID: 4CF3D7180200002500037F2D@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
 
> Ok, I implemented that capability
 
I applied all three patches with minor offsets, and it builds, but
several regression tests fail.  I backed out the patches in reverse
order and confirmed that while the regression tests pass  without
any of these patches, they fail with just the first, the first and
the second, or all three patches.
 
If you're not seeing the same thing there, I'll be happy to provide
the details.
 
-Kevin

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2010-11-29 23:42:57
Subject: Re: [PATCH] V3: Idle in transaction cancellation
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2010-11-29 21:56:50
Subject: Re: improving foreign key locks

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group