Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog??

From: Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog??
Date: 2010-11-22 19:20:16
Message-ID: 4CEAC270.6040608@emolecules.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On 11/22/10 10:42 AM, James Cloos wrote:
>>>>>> "TL" == Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
> TL> It *is* configurable: make pg_xlog a symlink.
>
> I notice that everyone suggests using a symlink, but I never see anyone
> suggest just mounting a filesystem there.
>
> Is there a (technical) reason for that? Or is a symlink just though to
> be easier to explain?

I think it's a case of, "If you know how do do this, you don't have to ask."

Craig

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-11-22 19:25:41 Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog??
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-11-22 19:02:43 Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog??