On 2010-11-12 07:18, Maciek Sakrejda wrote:
> We're getting off topic--perhaps I didn't express myself clearly.
> Getting back to Samuel's original point, if the ResultSet interface
> contract does not require a given implementation to provide thread
> safety for these operations--and it appears that it does not--then
> maybe pgjdbc should not try to provide it. If a user needs to use a
> ResultSet from multiple threads, it can be synchronized externally.
The pgjdbc driver is supposed to be thread safe:
Whether this is good or bad doesn't matter. Has been this way forever,
can't change that now.
Kyon, Till Toenges, tt(at)kyon(dot)de, http://kyon.de
Blumenstr. 39, 47798 Krefeld, +49-2151-3292595
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Lew||Date: 2010-11-12 13:41:20|
|Subject: Re: PSQLException: The column name <col> was not found in
|Previous:||From: Maciek Sakrejda||Date: 2010-11-12 06:18:32|
|Subject: Re: PSQLException: The column name <col> was not found in this ResultSet.|