From: | Hitoshi HEMMI <hemmi(dot)hitoshi(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres References |
Date: | 2010-11-11 04:40:24 |
Message-ID: | 4CDB73B8.3060005@oss.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Hello list,
NTT (it's a group of companies) uses both EDB Postgres Plus products and the community PostgreSQL. For the EDB's, EDB people know our utilization, and I will not mention that here. For the community PostgreSQL, I know we are using versions of it at about 150 sites. Unfortunately, for many of them I do not know how it is used in detail. Also, I cannot say words involved in our customers' matter. I may say something for the technical stuff, however, if you want (and of course if I know).
Thank you,
-hitoshi
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Sean Crowley
> <sean(dot)crowley(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>> NTT may not be on that list because they are an EnterpriseDB customer and
>> they are using Postgres Plus Advanced Server not the community PostgreSQL.
>>
>
> That makes sense. But should Yahoo be even be listed then, since
> their fork of Postgresql is even more drastic than EnterpriseDB's?
> Also, NTT seems to be heavily invested in the community version since
> they're participating in the development of some of its nicer
> features.
>
>
>
--
Hitoshi HEMMI
NTT Open Source Software Center
hemmi(dot)hitoshi(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp
Tel:(03)5860-5115
Fax:(03)5463-5490
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dan Langille | 2010-11-12 02:56:40 | PGCon 2011 - dates (corrected) |
Previous Message | damien clochard | 2010-11-10 13:28:09 | PostgreSQLFr : Call For Projects ! |