Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: A B <gentosaker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Szymon Guz <mabewlun(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences
Date: 2010-11-07 00:21:18
Message-ID: 4CD5F0FE.1080707@postnewspapers.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 11/05/2010 07:32 PM, A B wrote:

> The server will just boot, load data, run, hopefully not crash but if
> it would, just start over with load and run.

Have you looked at VoltDB? It's designed for fast in-memory use.

--
Craig Ringer

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-11-07 01:23:28 Re: Regression: 8.3 2 seconds -> 8.4 100+ seconds
Previous Message Jon Nelson 2010-11-06 18:37:12 Re: postmaster consuming /lots/ of memory with hash aggregate. why?