> Fair enough; I'm so used to bumping wal_buffers up to 16MB nowadays that
> I forget sometimes that people actually run with the default where this
> becomes an important consideration.
Do you have any testing in favor of 16mb vs. lower/higher?
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2010-11-05 22:11:43|
|Subject: Re: Major Linux performance regression; shouldn't we be
worried about RHEL6?|
|Previous:||From: Greg Smith||Date: 2010-11-05 22:06:05|
|Subject: Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for