On 31.10.2010 19:38, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Sorry for the interruption, our program now continues...
> Dimitri Fontaine<dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> writes:
>> That's exactly the road I want to avoid, because of the script parsing issues.
> In particular, embedded and/or dynamic calls in PLs will get hairy if
> not turing complete and outright impossible to solve.
Sorry, I don't follow. Got an example?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2010-10-31 18:00:41|
|Subject: Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for
|Previous:||From: Dimitri Fontaine||Date: 2010-10-31 17:38:18|
|Subject: Re: ALTER OBJECT any_name SET SCHEMA name|