Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ALTER OBJECT any_name SET SCHEMA name

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER OBJECT any_name SET SCHEMA name
Date: 2010-10-31 17:46:31
Message-ID: 4CCDAB77.9080806@enterprisedb.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 31.10.2010 19:38, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>
> Sorry for the interruption, our program now continues...
>
> Dimitri Fontaine<dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>  writes:
>> That's exactly the road I want to avoid, because of the script parsing issues.
>
> In particular, embedded and/or dynamic calls in PLs will get hairy if
> not turing complete and outright impossible to solve.

Sorry, I don't follow. Got an example?

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2010-10-31 18:00:41
Subject: Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger
Previous:From: Dimitri FontaineDate: 2010-10-31 17:38:18
Subject: Re: ALTER OBJECT any_name SET SCHEMA name

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group