Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: max_wal_senders must die

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die
Date: 2010-10-29 00:12:06
Message-ID: 4CCA1156.2030904@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Sorry, didn't know... I have 122 responses so far, which I think will be
> surprising (some of them certainly surprised me). I will keep it open
> until next week and then post the results.

Well, for any community site poll, I hope you realize that there's a LOT
of sampling error.  Here's another one:

http://www.postgresql.org/community/survey.71

-- 
                                  -- Josh Berkus
                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                                     http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2010-10-29 00:22:03
Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2010-10-28 23:45:18
Subject: Buildfarm server upgrade

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group