Re: Select count(*), the sequel

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Pierre C" <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>,"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Kenneth Marshall" <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>, "Mladen Gogala" <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Select count(*), the sequel
Date: 2010-10-27 20:11:16
Message-ID: 4CC841140200002500036EA2@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"Pierre C" <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com> wrote:

> in-page compression

How would that be different from the in-page compression done by
TOAST now? Or are you just talking about being able to make it
more aggressive?

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jon Nelson 2010-10-27 20:29:13 Re: temporary tables, indexes, and query plans
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-10-27 20:10:15 Re: AIX slow buffer reads