| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Simplifying replication |
| Date: | 2010-10-27 01:59:29 |
| Message-ID: | 4CC78781.4000206@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> If you set wal_keep_segments=0, archive_mode=on, and
> archive_command=<something>, you might run out of disk space.
>
> If you set wal_keep_segments=-1, you might run out of disk space.
>
> Are you any more screwed in the second case than you are in the first
> case?
It is the same to the user either way. In either case you have to
change some settings and restart the master.
Well, for the archive case, you could conceivably mass-delete the
archive files.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-27 02:03:59 | Re: Simplifying replication |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-27 01:25:34 | Re: max_wal_senders must die |