On 10/25/2010 07:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> However, that objection doesn't hold for plperl or pltcl (and likely
> not plpython, though I don't know that language enough to be sure).
> So it would be a reasonable feature request to teach those PLs to
> accept "record" parameters. I think the fact that they don't stems
> mostly from nobody having revisited their design since the
> infrastructure that supports record_out was created.
That seems like a good idea. I'll look at it for plperl.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-10-26 01:45:23|
|Subject: Re: security hook on authorization|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-10-26 01:31:04|
|Subject: Re: xlog.c: WALInsertLock vs. WALWriteLock|