Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: add label to enum syntax

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: add label to enum syntax
Date: 2010-10-25 19:52:59
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> Personally, I prefer LABEL.  But I could live with VALUE.
> That's roughly my position.
LABEL would seem more natural to me.  I would tend to think of the
VALUE as the hidden number which determines the order.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: James CloosDate: 2010-10-25 19:56:09
Subject: Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
Previous:From: Alan HodgsonDate: 2010-10-25 19:51:41
Subject: Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group