Le 25/10/2010 04:59, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>> Le 24/10/2010 08:13, Dave Page a écrit :
>>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>>>> In any case, unless you're willing to commit to testing every
>>>>> change/new feature on 7.3, 7.4, 8.0 and 8.1, we shouldn't pretend
>>>>> they're supported.
>>>> I'm not willing to do that. If it's not much work, I can still work on
>>>> that, but I for sure don't commit to do that. What I would prefer us to
>>>> do is allow the connection to an old unmaintained server with a big
>>>> warning telling that 1. they should upgrade PostgreSQL, and 2. they
>>>> could encounter bugs in pgAdmin as we don't commit to fix them with
>>>> unmaintained PostgreSQL releases.
>>> I'm fine with that (like I said, that's what I thought would happen
>>> anyway). Oops.
>>> I'll look into it.
>> Thanks :)
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: pgAdmin Trac||Date: 2010-10-25 15:25:01|
|Subject: [pgAdmin III] #269: Add the support for new values in enum user
|Previous:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2010-10-25 11:59:22|
|Subject: Re: pgAdmin III commit: Updated supported versions
for 1.14. Now that we ha|