Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgAdmin III commit: Updated supported versions for 1.14. Now that we ha

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgAdmin III commit: Updated supported versions for 1.14. Now that we ha
Date: 2010-10-25 14:39:41
Message-ID: 4CC596AD.5040907@lelarge.info (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
Le 25/10/2010 04:59, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>> Le 24/10/2010 08:13, Dave Page a écrit :
>>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>>>> In any case, unless you're willing to commit to testing every
>>>>> change/new feature on 7.3, 7.4, 8.0 and 8.1, we shouldn't pretend
>>>>> they're supported.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm not willing to do that. If it's not much work, I can still work on
>>>> that, but I for sure don't commit to do that. What I would prefer us to
>>>> do is allow the connection to an old unmaintained server with a big
>>>> warning telling that 1. they should upgrade PostgreSQL, and 2. they
>>>> could encounter bugs in pgAdmin as we don't commit to fix them with
>>>> unmaintained PostgreSQL releases.
>>>
>>> I'm fine with that (like I said, that's what I thought would happen
>>> anyway). Oops.
>>>
>>> I'll look into it.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks :)
> 
> Done.
> 

Thanks, Dave.


-- 
Guillaume
 http://www.postgresql.fr
 http://dalibo.com

In response to

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: pgAdmin TracDate: 2010-10-25 15:25:01
Subject: [pgAdmin III] #269: Add the support for new values in enum user types
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-10-25 11:59:22
Subject: Re: pgAdmin III commit: Updated supported versions for 1.14. Now that we ha

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group