Le 24/10/2010 08:13, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>> In any case, unless you're willing to commit to testing every
>>> change/new feature on 7.3, 7.4, 8.0 and 8.1, we shouldn't pretend
>>> they're supported.
>> I'm not willing to do that. If it's not much work, I can still work on
>> that, but I for sure don't commit to do that. What I would prefer us to
>> do is allow the connection to an old unmaintained server with a big
>> warning telling that 1. they should upgrade PostgreSQL, and 2. they
>> could encounter bugs in pgAdmin as we don't commit to fix them with
>> unmaintained PostgreSQL releases.
> I'm fine with that (like I said, that's what I thought would happen
> anyway). Oops.
> I'll look into it.
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Guillaume Lelarge||Date: 2010-10-24 18:53:51|
|Subject: pgAdmin III commit: Update the CHANGELOG file|
|Previous:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2010-10-24 15:13:43|
|Subject: Re: pgAdmin III commit: Updated supported versions
for 1.14. Now that we ha|