Re: Recovery bug

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Recovery bug
Date: 2010-10-19 08:18:39
Message-ID: 4CBD545F.4020707@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 19.10.2010 08:51, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Jeff Davis<pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> Do users have any expectation that they can restore a backup without
>>>> using recovery.conf by merely having the WAL segments in pg_xlog?
>>>
>>> I would expect that to work.
>
> What's the use case?

Creating a stand-alone backup tarball that contains both the base backup
and all WAL files required to restore.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-10-19 08:31:07 Re: Recovery bug
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2010-10-19 05:51:25 Re: Recovery bug