(2010/10/07 2:05), Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> Another thing that could raise eyebrows is that I chose to remove the
>>> "missing_ok" argument from get_role_oid_or_public, so it's not a perfect
>>> mirror of it. None of the current callers need it, but perhaps people
>>> would like these functions to be consistent.
>> Tom Lane suggested to add missing_ok argument, although it is not a must-
> Actually I think he suggested the opposite.
Ahh, I understood his suggestion as literal.
Well, I'd like to mark this patch as 'ready for committer'.
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-10-07 00:44:45|
|Subject: Re: todo point: plpgsql - scrollable cursors are supported|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-10-07 00:39:48|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance|